![]() |
Re: L16h51
Quote:
Ge Ge and Cong Cong told me they will not french anyone. Cong Cong was my worst bonk before Shun Zi. Now Shun Zi is my worst bonk. :( |
Re: L16h51
Bro MP5F, I respect u willing to advise her. I totally turn off by her attitude. U probably more mature man than me, more patient willing to guide her. I told her straight off dun talk to me, ask her seniors. I think she gone case.
Joker88 I agree with your comments rgd Shun Zi worse bonk than Cong Cong. Both of them are same category look young type. But with Cong Cong, I build rapport with her can get decent service. With Shun Zi, she takes my kindness for weakness, delieve me dun rtf service :mad: I actually dun want to post about her. But I had a bad day too. Perhaps my expectatations too high and I wasn't in a good mood today. Honestly, my reccomendation is "AVOID AT ALL COSTS" I couldn't even achieve a fire and forget mission. What do u think? First time in GL... Sheesh... |
Re: L16h51
Quote:
|
Re: L16h51
On 1st attempt on Cong cong I managed to steal French while missionary as she was high saw an opportunity as she moaning mouth side open ... After that we engaged wid French and kissing after that she told me she dun French let alone kissing ... Since she so insistence that if i ever RtFs no French n kissing I didn't rtf
|
Re: L16h51
Quote:
|
tres jolie
never tried shun zhi 1651 or gege w19, but i tried cong cong 2x when she was newbie last june/july, no luck frenching her, v cute tho so can't complain. Jing jing & lulu w12 french selectively on rtf like most wls nowadays, think only 1654 gals will french 1st time
|
Re: L16h51
this new batch seem cannot make it
bao bei - to me is very very average and commercial feel - zero gfe ting ting - super commercial feel and the face very cold. yan yan - yet to try - but the look is not those that worth waiting for lili - old milf look, is a dwarf version of 2062 anna. kitty - yet to try but the from the look - nothing to shout for. shunzi - as so many bro say ...CANNOT MAKE IT..even the okt say if u look for service dun call her...(they have disclaimer first hahaha) no flamming pls - i am just giving me frank opinion |
Re: L16h51
Quote:
She has one of the best body and nicest boobs in GL. Too bad she refused to french anyone. :( |
Re: L16h51
Quote:
Some WLs think SG is a bit restrictive. They "cannot this cannot that". N most WLs actually don't like to French, n receive "painting" from customers a fave habit of ours. |
Re: L16h51
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: L16h51
I dun think ShunZi can survive long. I hope I am wrong, for her sake, but i dun think so. She asked me how she can improve. I told her her attitude needs to change. Upon hearing that she said she was willing to serve and displayed good attitude. I gave up and told her not to talk to me anymore.
In my opinion, ShunZi wants to learn but lacks the maturity, determination and motivation to learn. She lacks people skills, a big disadvantage in her trade. She's happy with 6-8 customers a day and feels tired. After my unhappy session with her in the afternoon, I went to find Jin Jin at 11pm and told her she was a superwoman, 10+ sessions a day and she's always so high level service for me. Needless to say, Jin Jin delivered as usual, suck me to high heaven and rode me song song :D |
Stealing a frenching!
Quote:
Btw looks like u also busy gem hunting amongst the newbies hor;) |
Shunzi + Jin Jin
Quote:
Ball now in her court...whether she wants to up her game or not...must say though, saw her again in real short tight hotpants, quite a turn on, more so when she gave me a sexy sweet innocent smile upon recognising me...wtd i still hum sup tiko uncle:p:rolleyes: as for Jin Jin(16W12) cant agree wif u more mate...solid chiobu gem now wif added passion n sensuality:cool: |
Re: Shunzi + Jin Jin
Quote:
Does Jin Jin (1612) still work? Since there is so many good reviews, I tried to make an appointment, but the OKT always said "Jin Jin no more." I thought that meant Jin Jin does not work any longer, but I guess he meant that she was fully booked.... |
Re: Tong Tong(1651) n Dong Jing(1856)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2025