View Single Post
  #12682  
Old 02-08-2016, 11:10 PM
mrclen mrclen is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 121 / Power: 12
mrclen deserves two Tigers! - He's a Great Guymrclen deserves two Tigers! - He's a Great Guy
Re: Vietnam - HCM (Thread 3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidtip View Post
this is what I said:


Almost all of the customers in the outlying shops are locals, many of who refuse to use condoms and who mistreat the girls. The incidence of disease including HIV is higher as you move further from the city in an attempt to save $5. And, if there are no pretty girls in the cheap venue you will have wasted a significant part of your day.

Keep in mind that the best looking girls all travel to where they can make the most money and this means the central D1 area.
Here is my personal theory.. Please feel free to disagree!!!

In a venue that caters more to the business man and upscale clients the WL's may be cleaner and more STD free and this level of client would be more likely to visit a doctor if he had any sort of problem. This could translate to a better chance of not taking something home with you you don't want.

In an area where there are hordes of sex tourists, the reverse may be true.

So my ideal location is between the sex tourist area and the lower class areas where the clients may not be as concerned with cleanliness and more concerned with costs. IE: they can afford an occasion romp with a WL but don't have the funds necessary to take care of any problems or routine check ups.

However none of my theory suggests not to use any and all protection against STD's and to get regular checkups if you partake in mongering on a regular basis.