Quote:
Originally Posted by bondage
Continuing on this topic - very subjective. Many times too, one's words can be another one's poison. As a bro said in another thread, this thread can be quite fierce with zaps. The open discussion here is good. I trust the bro who started the aging topic has not been zapped.
If one searches this thread, one should be able to find what I said about ZZ age. I would say this additionally : the chronological age is less important than the biological age of the person including face etc, much less the service attitude and levels plus personality of the person.
Yesterday Sunday Times was about men in their 50s n beyond who don't look like their age. I don't know them personally or their personality but respect them for taking care of bodies.
|
true la, biological age is most important. who cares what the ML's real age is, we all know that they put fake age on SLG too. when asked, they could just add a couple of years to the fake age or insist it is real, who knows if it is true. So it ultimately doesn't matter. The game is not on guessing the age. What's more pertinent is the lady looks good enough to you.
Hope the bro didn't get zapped too. Different ppl judge age differently. Bros who read MR/FRs have to bear in mind that they are all subjective, and dependant on the state the ML is in during the visit (apart from obviously fake MR/FRs). I had problems judging yue yue's age in my recent MR on her as well; just couldn't put a finger on it. If the who bro started this topic got zapped, it definitely was not from me, as I've never zapped anyone before. I was merely contributing back my own opinion about it and caveated that I visited her only once.
Anyway I think it is good to have a range of views and multiple sincere MRs for all bros to make their own call. Happy chionging bros.